Exploring South African tax consequences of compensation received by amateur rugby players

Exploring South African tax consequences of compensation received by amateur rugby players

Authors: Danielle van Wyk & Cara Thiart

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Senior Lecturer in Accounting at the School of Accountancy, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Stellenbosch; Lecturer in Taxation at the School of Accountancy, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Stellenbosch
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 1, 2024, p. 59 – 86
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i1a3

Abstract

Both professional and amateur rugby players participate in community rugby. There is currently no guidance in the South African literature that expressly addresses the possible tax consequences of compensation received by amateur rugby players, if any. The objective of this article is therefore to explore the potential tax consequences of such compensation. The research approach entails an exploratory study, adopting a qualitative research approach in the form of an extensive literature review and an international comparative analysis. The study provides contradictory insights on the common perception that compensation received by amateur rugby players has no tax implications in South Africa. The study found that contracted amateur rugby players are considered employees of community rugby clubs and their compensation, depending on the nature, is in most instances taxable. Non-contracted amateur rugby players whose compensation consists of only the reimbursement of bona fide expenses are not considered employees of community rugby clubs, although reimbursements received may be subject to taxation. The findings are compared to current taxation practices of sports players in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. The research is valuable to amateur rugby players and community rugby clubs to ensure tax compliance and improved compensation practices.

The application of section 8c of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 in the context of trust structures

The application of section 8c of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 in the context of trust structures

Authors: Lumen Moolman & Riaan Wessels

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Partner, Webber Wentzel; Senior lecturer, Department of Accountancy, University of Johannesburg
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 1, 2024, p. 87 – 111
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i1a4

Abstract

Broadly, section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 seeks to tax directors and employees at revenue rates on certain amounts arising in the context of the ownership of shares or instruments deriving their value from shares (ie, ‘equity instruments’ as defined in section 8C). Paragraph (c) of the ‘equity instrument’ definition was introduced into section 8C(7) with the purpose of ensuring that employees cannot avoid the consequences of section 8C by interposing an intermediary entity between themselves and the shares to which their incentives or remuneration are linked. In terms of paragraph (c) of the ‘equity instrument’ definition, the ambit of section 8C was extended to include ‘any contractual right à the value of which is determined directly or indirectly with reference to a share’. This study considered the application of paragraph (c) of the ‘equity instrument’ definition in the context where an employee receives a contractual right, the value of which is derived from shares as well as non-share-related assets. Based on the wording of section 8C, read in the overall context and purpose of the provision, an interpretation where section 8C applies either fully to a contractual right (where the majority of the assets are shares) or not at all (where the minority of the assets are shares) seems to best marry all the relevant factors.

Case note: Circumventing section 7(8)(a)(i) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 and section 37d of the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 through strategic resignation: CNN v NN2023 (5) SA 199 (GJ)

Case note: Circumventing section 7(8)(a)(i) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 and section 37d of the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 through strategic resignation: CNN v NN2023 (5) SA 199 (GJ)

Authors: Tumo Maloka & Koma Ramontja

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Professor at University of Pretoria; PhD Candidate—National University of Lesotho
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 1, 2024, p. 112 – 124
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i1a5

Abstract

None

Case note: The value of characterisation: Competition Commission v Irwin & Johnson & another (2022) 2 CPLR 26 (CAC)

Case note: The value of characterisation: Competition Commission v Irwin & Johnson & another (2022) 2 CPLR 26 (CAC)

Author: Damian Schmidt

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Attorney at law in Stuttgart (Germany)
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 36 Issue 1, 2024, p. 125 – 134
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v36/i1a6

Abstract

None

The 2007 Work in Fishing Convention as an instrument to combat coercive recruitment practices: A South African perspective

The 2007 Work in Fishing Convention as an instrument to combat coercive recruitment practices: A South African perspective

Authors: N Hlazo and H Hamukuaya

ISSN: 2521-5442
Affiliations: LLB, LLM, LLD; Honorary research fellow, School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, and Researcher, South African International Maritime Institute
Source: Amalwandle Ethu: Journal of Ocean Law and Governance in Africa, 2022, p. 1 – 21
https://doi.org/10.47348/JOGA/2022/a1

Abstract

The 2007 Work in Fishing Convention(C188) aims to ensure decent work conditions for fishers by establishing minimum work standards on board a fishing vessel. Despite the comprehensive nature of the C188, forced labour remains a pervasive challenge in the fisheries sector, exacerbated by the recruitment of vulnerable workers through deceptive practices. This article determines the extent to which South Africa’s current legal and regulatory measures comply with the C188 provisions relating to the recruitment and placement of fishers. The article concludes that there is a lacuna in South Africa’s legal framework in its obligation to regulate the recruitment and placement agencies of fishers, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation by unscrupulous recruitment agencies. The article suggests two possible solutions to effectively implement the provisions of the C188 relating to the recruitment and placement of fishers. One option is to amend the existing Seafarer Recruitment and Placement Regulations of 2017 to include fishers. Alternatively, new Merchant Shipping (Fisher Recruitment and Placement) Regulations could be drafted. These new regulations would align with the existing Seafarer Recruitment and Placement Regulations and could be promulgated under the Merchant Shipping Act of 1951 or its successor, thereby giving effect to the convention.