Children flourishing: Evolving capacities, human dignity and the realisation of children’s rights in South Africa

ARTICLE

Children flourishing: Evolving capacities, human dignity and the realisation of children’s rights in South Africa

Authors: Bryony Elizabeth Fox & Caitlyn Lattimer

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Chair in Urban Law and Sustainability Governance, Stellenbosch University; LLD Candidate, Department of Private Law, Stellenbosch University
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 142 Issue 4, p. 800-821
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v142/i4a8

Abstract

This article examines the potential of the principle of evolving capacities, outlined in art 5 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (‘CRC’), to enhance the realisation of children’s rights in South Africa. Although the principle is not explicitly recognised in South African law, it offers a normative framework for balancing children’s rights to protection and autonomy. The principle, which is grounded in international law and is aligned with ss 10 and 28 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, can be understood in light of the constitutional values of human dignity and human flourishing. The article explores the principle’s conceptual foundations, as well as its interpretative, developmental, participatory and protective functions. It then analyses how the principle has been implicitly referenced in South African legislation, albeit that it is underdeveloped in South African jurisprudence. Finally, it proposes a constitutionally grounded approach for the principle’s greater domestic application. In doing so, the article advocates for a more context-sensitive and dignity-affirming jurisprudence for children in South Africa.

The rise of judicial review of South Africa’s treaty-making powers

ARTICLE

The rise of judicial review of South Africa’s treaty-making powers

Author: Hannah Woolaver

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 142 Issue 4, p. 822-856
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v142/i4a9

Abstract

This article examines recent developments in judicial review of South Africa’s treatymaking powers. It analyses court decisions that have expanded the procedural and substantive review of the executive’s authority to enter into and withdraw from treaties. The article argues that while these developments aim to enhance accountability, they risk intruding on the executive’s foreign affairs discretion and creating conflicts between domestic and international obligations. Drawing on comparative practice, it proposes refinements to limit standing, timing of review, and standards of scrutiny. The article concludes that clearer constitutional delineation of treaty powers may be needed to balance democratic accountability, rights protection, and effective foreign policy conduct.