The Evolution of Privacy and Data Protection in Kenya

The Evolution of Privacy and Data Protection in Kenya

Author Mugambi Laibuta

ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: LLB (Moi University) LLM (London School of Economics and Political Sciences) PhD (University of the Witwatersrand). Advocate of the High Court of Kenya; Certified Information Privacy Manager
Source: Fundamina, Volume 30 Issue 1, p. 116-165
https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v30/i1a4

Abstract

The contribution looks at the right to privacy within Kenya’s legal system by setting out the constitutional, legislative and jurisprudential framework on this right, as well as the right to data protection. The evolution of the rights to privacy and data protection in Kenya have been marked by significant milestones, reflecting global trends and local imperatives. The right to privacy in Kenya has featured in the constitutional text since Kenya gained independence from colonial rule. Conversations during the clamour for constitutional reforms shaped the current constitutional text that provides for an individual right to privacy and has been the springboard for the promulgation of legislation regarding data protection rights. The enactment of the Data Protection Act, 2019 was a pivotal moment, providing a legal framework for the protection of personal data. The Act emphasises the rights of individuals regarding their personal data, including the rights to be informed about the processing thereof, to access it and to its rectification. The Act also provides for baseline data protection principles and grants the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner powers to enforce data subject rights and data protection principles. Other legislation, such as the Children Act and the HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, also provide privacy safeguards. For decades, the Kenyan courts have ruled in favour of the right to privacy. However, despite legislative developments, some statutes regulating national security organs still contain provisions limiting the right to privacy. This contribution describes the past and present status of the rights to privacy and of data protection in Kenya.

In Memoriam: Professor DG Kleyn (1955–2024)

In Memoriam: Professor DG Kleyn (1955–2024)

Author Emile Zitzke

ISSN: 2411-7870
Affiliations: Associate Professor of Law, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Source: Fundamina, Volume 30 Issue 1, p. 166-170

Abstract

Extraordinary. That is the late Professor Duard Kleyn of the University of Pretoria summarised in one word. In this tribute, I will reflect on some of the ways in which Duard embodied extraordinariness in his professional and personal life. I write this as a former student who later became a colleague, mentee and a friend.

Added features test

Tax Instruments for the Mining Sector: Profitbased Taxes Versus Production-Based Taxes

Author: Kalo Achille Sanou

ISSN: 2709-8575
Affiliations: Université Clermont-Auvergne, CNRS, IRD, CERDI, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Source: African Multidisciplinary Tax Journal, 2024 Issue 1, p. 1–17
https://doi.org/10.47348/AMTJ/V4/i1a1

Share

Cite this article

Sanou, K A Tax Instruments for the Mining Sector: Profitbased Taxes Versus Production-Based Taxes African Multidisciplinary Tax Journal Volume 4, Issue 1 (2024) p. 1–17 https://doi.org/10.47348/AMTJ/V4/i1a1

Abstract

The sharing of mining rents is a particular challenge for African countries. To explain the determinants of profit-based and production-based taxes, we use a panel of 22 gold-producing countries in Africa between 2000 and 2020 using the ordinary least squares (OLS) method controlled for time and country fixed effects. Our empirical results show that the road distance between the capital of the country and its relevant port is an important indicator in the choice of rent taxation instruments. The road distance between the capital of a country and its relevant port tends to reduce the average effective tax rate (AETR) through the share of profit-based taxes in AETR. Thus, countries that do not have direct access to the sea should favour production-based taxes over profit-based taxes in the taxation of mining rents.

The Draft Lower Courts Bill — A serious attempt to transform the civil justice system, or another window-dressing exercise?

Note

The Draft Lower Courts Bill — A serious attempt to transform the civil justice system, or another window-dressing exercise?

Author: Mohamed Paleker

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Professor, Department of Private Law, University of Cape Town
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 141 Issue 3, p. 437-454
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v141/i3a1

Abstract

The magistrates’ courts are often the first point of access to the civil justice system and are therefore crucial for ensuring access to justice. The Magistrates’ Courts Act 32 of 1944 (‘the MCA’) regulates their powers, functions, and procedures. While the legislation has been amended several times, there is a growing consensus that it needs to be replaced. This note examines some aspects of the draft Lower Courts Bill, which the Department of Justice has proposed as a replacement for the MCA. It discusses some of its positive features, identifies gaps in the proposed legislation, and provides suggestions for improving it.

Investors beware — Public-interest considerations in merger review are significant: The Burger King matter

Note

Investors beware — Public-interest considerations in merger review are significant: The Burger King matter

Author: Jacqueline Church

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Senior Lecturer, University of Pretoria
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 141 Issue 3, p. 454-466
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v141/i3a2

Abstract

In South Africa, statutory competition law serves as a vehicle to address both traditional economic goals and broader social and political concerns. This is particularly apparent in the field of merger regulation, where public interests must be considered in the merger analysis. This note focuses on the so-called Burger King merger, which was notified to the Competition Commission and initially prohibited. Notably, this marks the first time since the inception of the Competition Act 89 of 1998 that an intermediate merger has been prohibited solely on public-interest grounds. However, the Tribunal subsequently cleared the merger, but only after the merging parties agreed to accept the onerous conditions imposed upon them.