Using market inquiries: A sharper tool for competition authorities?

Using market inquiries: A sharper tool for competition authorities?

Authors: Itumeleng Lesofe & Siphosethu Tetani

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Principal Analyst, Competition Commission SA; Senior Analyst, Competition Commission SA
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 35 Issue 3, 2023, p. 327 – 369
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v35/i3a4

Abstract

The emergence of new markets, especially in the digital sector where business models are complex and innovation is constantly changing the competition landscape, has brought about new regulatory challenges for competition agencies across the world. These challenges may require a departure from the traditional tools of enforcement and the development of a somewhat new regulatory approach. In middle-income countries, the need for the adjustment of enforcement tools is further necessitated by persistent and stubbornly high levels of concentration in key sectors that have a potential to contribute to the realisation of an inclusive and growing economy. For example, in South Africa, the Competition Commission of South Africa (CCSA) has recorded unquestionable successes in cartel enforcement in the past two decades, with hefty fines imposed against those found to have participated in cartel conduct. However, the application of traditional tools of enforcement in abuse of dominance cases has borne little success and, as a result, key industries such as steel and agriculture remain highly concentrated. This has prompted government, through the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, to strengthen the powers of the CCSA by, among other things, adding to its toolbox the power to conduct market inquiries. This article examines whether market inquiries are best suited, and a more effective enforcement tool used to address market concentration challenges in South Africa. The article draws from market inquiries conducted by the CCSA in banking, data, and digital sectors. It also critiques the CCSA’s powers to conduct market inquiries.

Does a settlement agreement between litigants in a civil dispute terminate the jurisdiction of the court?

Does a settlement agreement between litigants in a civil dispute terminate the jurisdiction of the court?

Author: R C Williams

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Professor Emeritus, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 35 Issue 3, 2023, p. 370 – 389
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v35/i3a5

Abstract

This article addresses the legal consequences of a settlement agreement concluded, prior to judgment, between litigants engaged in a civil dispute, with a particular focus on the effect of such an agreement on the jurisdiction of the adjudicating court. Does the settlement agreement terminate the jurisdiction of the court in respect of the litigated issues? Or does the court have the power to ignore the settlement agreement if it does not reflect the equities of the dispute between the litigants and give a judgment based on its own assessment of the equities of the claim and the defence? Or if the court takes the view that the settlement agreement is an attempt by the litigants to avoid the judicial scrutiny of improper conduct û in which event can the court give an order that will prevent the litigants from carrying out the agreement? The focus of this article is the conflict, in this regard, between two recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeal.

Case Note: A discussion of penalties for non-compliance with picketing rules: Clover SA (Pty) Ltd v General Industries Workers Union of South Africa & others [2021] 4 BLLR 419 (LC)

Case Note: A discussion of penalties for non-compliance with picketing rules: Clover SA (Pty) Ltd v General Industries Workers Union of South Africa & others [2021] 4 BLLR 419 (LC)

Author: Mashudu Monica Mulaudzi

ISSN: 1996-2185
Affiliations: Lecturer, Department of Mercantile Law, University of South Africa
Source: South African Mercantile Law Journal, Volume 35 Issue 3, 2023, p. 390 – 407
https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v35/i3a6

Abstract

None

Cases: Zondi v Registrar of Financial Services Providers and Another Case no 2023/067825; [2024] ZAGPJHC 410 (29 April 2024)

Cases: Zondi v Registrar of Financial Services Providers and Another Case no 2023/067825; [2024] ZAGPJHC 410 (29 April 2024)

Author Daleen Millard

ISSN: 2517-9543
Affiliations: Dean: Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University
Source: Juta’s Insurance Law Bulletin, Volume 27 Issue 2, 2024, p. 21 – 25

Abstract

None