Barcoding banknotes: Moving towards a system addressing cash anonymity in money laundering and terrorist financing operations

Barcoding banknotes: Moving towards a system addressing cash anonymity in money laundering and terrorist financing operations

Author: Ruann Jansen van Vuren

ISSN: 1996-2118
Affiliations: Bcom (Law) LLB (Stell), Paralegal to Advocate LJ Van Tonder SC
Source: South African Journal of Criminal Justice, Volume 37 Issue 1, p. 21 – 47
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v37/i1a2

Abstract

The anonymity in cash transactions present a significant hurdle in financial crime prevention. The central issue in addressing illicit cashflows lies in the difficulty to distinguish between licit and illicit cashflows amongst countless daily cash transactions. Addressing the issue poses the challenge of identifying a balance between an extreme of total surveillance, which can impinge on freedoms and disrupt cash-dependant economies, and total inaction, which allows illicit flows to persist. Between these two extremes lie various middle paths, some more effective than others in striking the required balance. Through an examination of the historical landscape of money laundering, the evolution of countermeasures, and the exploitation of gaps by criminals, a technologically advanced solution is proposed. In this regard, the implementation of traceable barcodes on banknotes aims to enhance transparency and traceability in financial dealings. A barcoded system is an innovative strategy to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing. This article assesses the viability, potential impacts and challenges of this system in policy formulation and economic frameworks, contributing to the discourse on enhancing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

Enhancing the criminal justice response to human trafficking in South Africa: Legislation and case law in the spotlight

Enhancing the criminal justice response to human trafficking in South Africa: Legislation and case law in the spotlight

Author: Beatri Kruger

ISSN: 1996-2118
Affiliations: BA, LLB, LLM, LLD, Emeritus Professor and Research Fellow, Free State Centre for Human Rights, Faculty of Law, University of the Free State
Source: South African Journal of Criminal Justice, Volume 37 Issue 1, p. 48 – 83
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v37/i1a3

Abstract

Human traffickers continually develop new tactics to trick and trap their victims, making human trafficking a complex and evolving crime that demands a robust criminal justice response. This response must be consistently refined to combat this pervasive crime effectively. In South Africa, the Prevention and Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act 7 of 2013 (Trafficking Act) came into force in 2015 to address the multifaceted crime. Now, after eight years, this article delves into the status of the counter-trafficking response, focusing on the efficacy of the anti-trafficking legislation and its implementation by the courts. It was found that, first, the Trafficking Act, as previously confirmed, complies with international minimum standards, and encompasses all forms of trafficking. Secondly, through the implementation and interpretation of this legislation, the courts have established jurisprudence on human trafficking, making a significant contribution to the criminal justice response. By reviewing case law spanning the period 2009 to 2023, this article aims to contribute novel insights to the existing body of knowledge, based on evidence tested in courts. Examining emerging case law, the article sheds light on various features of human trafficking within the criminal justice arena. It focuses specifically on the gravity and nature of human trafficking, penalties imposed by the courts, both domestic and cross-border trafficking, and new insights into various types of trafficking perpetrated within South Africa. Notably, court judgments increasingly offer binding and clarifying decisions. Case law has endorsed the only legally binding definition of human trafficking and provided interpretations of concepts in trafficking legislation. However, alongside the positive contributions of case law, the article also identifies legislative challenges. Consequently, recommendations are presented to enhance and fortify the criminal justice response to human trafficking in South Africa.

Policing in a failing state: An impossible mission

Policing in a failing state: An impossible mission

Author: David Masiloane

ISSN: 1996-2118
Affiliations: DLitt et Phil (Unisa); Professor, Department of Police Practice, Unisa
Source: South African Journal of Criminal Justice, Volume 37 Issue 1, p. 84 – 102
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v37/i1a4

Abstract

The political interference and poor governance lead to a weak police service that fails to provide safety and security to communities. This exposes people to crime and criminality and makes them lose trust in the police, compelling them to take the law into their own hands. A weak state paralyses the police, and a paralysed police service reflect a weak state. This study analysed books, articles, and print and electronic media to determine whether South Africa exhibits some of the characteristics of a failing state, and what impact this has on the police and policing in the country. The failure of the state at any level – such as the inability of the National Student Financial Aid Scheme to speedily disburse financial aid to students, municipalities’ incapacity to render services to communities, and the police’s powerlessness in dealing with high crime rates – leads to public discontent, anger and frustration, which tend to be expressed through violent protests. The policing of these protests is often criticised as being either indecisive or brutal, thus presenting a continuous challenge to police leadership on how to strike a sensitive balance between indecisiveness and brutality.

The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen case before the International Criminal Court: A Twail-er’s perspective

The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen case before the International Criminal Court: A Twail-er’s perspective

Author: Linda Mushoriwa

ISSN: 1996-2118
Affiliations: LLB (University of Zimbabwe) LLM (Unisa) PhD (University of KwaZulu-Natal); Researcher, African Centre for Transnational Criminal Justice, University of the Western Cape
Source: South African Journal of Criminal Justice, Volume 37 Issue 1, p. 103 – 126
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v37/i1a5

Abstract

This paper explores whether the International Criminal Court (ICC or ‘the court’) has lived up to the expectation of being an effective and universal mechanism of international criminal justice and accountability, by using the judgment of the Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen as a case study. Ongwen was convicted by the court’s Trial Chamber (TC) IX in February 2021, on 61 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity perpetrated in Northern Uganda between July 2002 and December 2005, and sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment. The Appeals Chamber (AC) confirmed both the conviction and sentence in a judgment rendered on 15 December 2022. It will be argued from a Third World approaches to international law (TWAIL) perspective, that the court missed an opportunity to improve its institutional legitimacy, considering the legitimacy deficit stemming from claims by African states that the ICC is biased against Africa. The paper will also argue that the court missed an opportunity to improve its own decision-making by expanding its source material to include sources from the Global South.

A Critical Review of Jurisprudence on the Adjudication of Presidential Election Petitions in Africa

A Critical Review of Jurisprudence on the Adjudication of Presidential Election Petitions in Africa

Author: Justice Mavedzenge

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: PhD Constitutional Law (UCT), LLM Constitutional and Administrative Law (UCT), LLB (UNISA), BA (MSU). Adjunct Senior Lecturer of Public Law Research Fellow, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 11 Issue 1, p. 1 – 30
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v11/i1a1

Abstract

A survey of jurisprudence on the adjudication of presidential election petitions in Africa yields different and sometimes confusing results on the legal approaches that are being applied by courts in different jurisdictions to determine the standard of proof which a petitioner must discharge and the nature of violations which a petitioner must prove in order for the court to vitiate an election. This is despite the fact that most of these countries share similar legal frameworks in the sense that their rules of evidence are similar while their constitutions require elections to be conducted in a way which adheres to the principles of universal suffrage, free suffrage, equal suffrage and secret suffrage. The emergence of divergent views and positions among courts which operate on the basis of a similar legal framework reflects a lack of coherence in the emerging African jurisprudence on the adjudication of presidential election petitions. What then is the appropriate standard of proof which the petitioner must discharge in a presidential election petition, and what kind of violations should a petitioner prove in order for the court to vitiate an election? In an attempt to contribute towards strengthening the role of the courts in resolving election disputes, this paper suggests that the approach to be taken by courts when adjudicating election petitions should very much depend on the case that has been presented by the petitioner. Where the petitioner is alleging irregularities and is claiming that those irregularities affected the results of the election, the question that must be examined by the court is the extent to which the results were affected. Where the petitioner’s challenge is directed at the integrity of the election process, the question to be examined by the court should be the extent to which the integrity of the process was violated.

A Comparative Analysis of the Right to Protest Under the Nigerian Public Order Act and the South African Regulation of Gatherings Act

A Comparative Analysis of the Right to Protest Under the Nigerian Public Order Act and the South African Regulation of Gatherings Act

Author: Cyril Ekeke

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: LLB, BL (Nigeria) LLM, LLD (Pretoria), Senior Lecturer, Federal College of Education, Rivers State, Nigeria
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 11 Issue 1, p. 31 – 83
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v11/i1a2

Abstract

The handling of the #EndSARS protests in 2020 and 2021 by the Nigerian authorities has once again brought to the fore the restriction of the right to protest in Nigeria, and in Africa as a whole, and the need to compare the right to protest under various African jurisdictions. Protest can be the catalyst for positive change in the social, political, economic and cultural life of a country, and therefore the right to protest is guaranteed under international, regional African and domestic human rights legal frameworks. In Nigeria, the Public Order Act of 1990 is designed to give effect to the provisions of the Constitution in terms of the appropriate and peaceful conduct of protests. Likewise in South Africa, the Regulation of Gatherings Act 205 of 1993 regulates the holding of public gatherings and demonstrations, in alignment with the provisions of the Constitution. This paper applies doctrinal methodology to undertake a comparative study of the right to protest under the Nigerian Public Order Act and the South African Regulation of Gatherings Act, specifically because South Africa has seen a groundswell of protests in the past few years with minimal restrictions. This paper finds that despite some shortfalls in the Regulation of Gatherings Act, it is a more potent law than the Public Order Act in ensuring the right to protest. This paper further argues that the robustness of the Regulation of Gatherings Act could serve as a template for strengthening the Nigerian Public Order Act to fully guarantee the right to protest in Nigeria.

Tobacco Labelling and Advertising Rules: Lessons from Other Countries for Zimbabwe

Tobacco Labelling and Advertising Rules: Lessons from Other Countries for Zimbabwe

Author: Christopher Munguma

ISSN: 2521-2605
Affiliations: LLB (Zimbabwe), LLM (Africa University, Zimbabwe), DPhil Intellectual Property candidate, Lecturer at Africa University, Zimbabwe
Source: Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, Volume 11 Issue 1, p. 56 – 83
https://doi.org/10.47348/JCLA/v11/i1a3

Abstract

This paper analysed the approach that has been taken by four countries in controlling tobacco usage through advertising and labelling rules. The paper is a documentary analysis and literature review of primary and secondary legal sources. The paper considered the national approaches adopted by the Commonwealth of Australia, the United Kingdom (UK), Thailand and Zimbabwe. The first three nations were used as examples that can offer lessons to Zimbabwe on how international tobacco control obligations are met. Australia and the UK were the first two countries to adopt plain packaging and hence offer some best practices. Thailand, on the other hand, was the first developing country to adopt plain packaging rules. Thailand’s case shows that developing countries can also adopt sound tobacco control rules. The Australian law led to several national and international legal challenges that were resolved in favour of Australia. The legal domestic challenges against standardised packaging in the United Kingdom were also resolved in favour of the British government. It was established in the study that, despite acceding to the World Health Organisation Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), the Zimbabwean national legal framework is not yet compliant with the FCTC international treaty obligations. The laws of Zimbabwe are scanty and leave a lot of gaps in the control framework which have been exploited by tobacco manufacturers. This is unsatisfactory and calls for action on the part of the government.