Reviewing artificial intelligence (AI) in the 21st century: a study of David Hanson’s Sophia – a gynoid
Reviewing artificial intelligence (AI) in the 21st century: a study of David Hanson’s Sophia – a gynoid
Authors: Emily Oghale God’spresence and Azuka FN God’spresence
ISSN: 3078-2821
Affiliations: Reader, Department of Film and Multimedia Studies, Faculty of Communication and Media Studies, University of Port Harcourt; Instructional/Tutorial Facilitator and Project Supervisor, Faculty of Education, National Open University of Nigeria
Source: International Journal of African Reflections 2024, p. 137 – 163
https://doi.org/10.47348/IJAR/2024/a7
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), otherwise referred to as ‘Intelligent Machine’ or ‘Electronic Brain’, is a technological innovation which came into the limelight in the mid-20th century. It is referred to as AI because it displays fabulous intelligence and emotions, yet only as digital electronics. However, there are critical ethical and economic considerations about AI: the first is the fear that they are built to undertake difficult and various tasks capably with great ease, economy of time and remarkable accuracy. In this way, they give rise to a speculative fear that these ‘thinking machines’ may take over human economic activity. The second consideration is the high cost of building a robotic project. This article sets out (1) to create and provoke academic debate on the desirability of Intelligent Machines in a world plagued by human rights violations, material poverty and structural violence; (2) to investigate the interaction between human beings and innovative technology; (3) to interrogate the usability of AI as a possible threat or asset to human existence and activity; and (4) to view the gender profiling of Sophia as a ‘multi-tasking’ fembot. The methodology adopted for this study is qualitative, using an analytical approach to examine the relationship between human beings and AI. Utilitarian Ethical Theory forms the theoretical framework for the study. This article suggests that the existence of humanity is in a precarious state and therefore recommends that control measures be imposed on the use of AI in order to prevent infringements of human rights and to limit the predictable but uncontrolled activities of robots in the immediate future.