When the legal pathways for sound financial management and spatial justice collide: The case of South African cities

When the legal pathways for sound financial management and spatial justice collide: The case of South African cities

Author: Anél du Plessis

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Professor of Law and NRF South African Research Chair in Cities, Law and Environmental Sustainability, Faculty of Law, North-West University
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 139 Issue 3, p. 650-677
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v139/i3a7

Abstract

This article probes one aspect of spatial (in)justice and slow spatial transformation in South Africa’s cities. The focus is not so much on case studies or an analysis of persisting spatial injustices. Instead, the article focuses on the legal premises and the apparently colliding legal pathways for sound municipal finance management and spatial justice. It specifically questions, through a mixed research method, the extent to which the co-existence of the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 16 of 2013 (‘SPLUMA’) and the Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act 56 of 2003 (‘MFMA’), as two Acts in the suite of post-apartheid South African local government legislation, runs the risk of thwarting local government efforts to transform social and physical space in the country’s cities. This question is considered through an exploratory review of the Acts, empirical findings, and a consideration of the limited theory on the interoperability of laws.

Constitutional futures and the South African demos: Time for some univocal sovereignty?

Constitutional futures and the South African demos: Time for some univocal sovereignty?

Author: Tracy-Lynn Field

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: Claude Leon Chair in Earth Justice and Stewardship, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 139 Issue 3, p. 678-716
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v139/i3a8

Abstract

This article engages and extends the proposition that the debate on constitutionalism in the postcolony should restore the sovereignty of the demos to a central position. The notion of a unified South African demos is contested, but the arguments against working with the presently constituted unified demos are not overwhelming. With democratic sovereignty as the key focus, the question is how the demos’ lifeblood of present consent can be injected into the current South African constitutional order. Drawing on Grewal & Purdy’s development of Tuck’s reconstruction of original constitutionalism, the article presents six variables for understanding democratic self-rule over time: unified and splintered sovereignty; univocal and multitudinous constitution-making; popular authorship; and present consent. Taking into account Arato’s post-sovereign model of constitution-making, the article argues that South Africa’s constitutional order may be leaning too far in the direction of splintered sovereignty, multitudinous constitution-making and a preoccupation with the act of founding. Instead, the unified sovereign, univocal constitution-making and the imperative of present consent need to be firmly placed on the agenda. The article concludes by considering four ways in which the unified sovereign could be brought back into the realm of constitution-making in South Africa.

Book Review: Jean D’Aspremont & Sahib Singh (eds) Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (2019)

Book Review: Jean D’Aspremont & Sahib Singh (eds) Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (2019)

Author: C H Powell

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: University of Cape Town
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 139 Issue 3, p. 728-732
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v139/i3a11

Abstract

None

Book Notice: Andreas van Wyk & Gerhard Lubbe Stellenbosch Law Faculty 100 Years/Stellenbosse Regsfakulteit 100 Jaar (2021)

Book Notice: Andreas van Wyk & Gerhard Lubbe Stellenbosch Law Faculty 100 Years/Stellenbosse Regsfakulteit 100 Jaar (2021)

Author: Daniel Visser

ISSN: 1996-2177
Affiliations: University of Cape Town
Source: South African Law Journal, Volume 139 Issue 3, p. 733-735
https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v139/i3a12

Abstract

None