Abstract

The article considers the role of tax disputes as a signal of a company’s approach to corporate governance by considering two tax disputes between the South African Revenue Service and the Steinhoff group. It seeks to illustrate the role of tax disputes as a signal of corporate governance concerns through an analysis of the two cases, namely CSARS v Capstone 556 (Pty) Ltd and CSARS v Kluh Investments (Pty) Ltd. The tests used in determining tax liability can be difficult to navigate where the respective roles of the board of directors, the directors and the shareholders are not clear, with de facto and de jure ownership and control shifting between the various parties. This may create uncertainty about who is actually in control of the company and who is legally in control of the company. An in-depth analysis of these two cases shows that tax disputes can alert stakeholders and serve as a warning that something is amiss in the governance of the company.